Sunday, March 22, 2009

 

Need for a Judicially Enforceable Australian Bill of Rights

The Australian Human Rights Commission writes:
'In theory, all Australians are entitled to enjoy the rights and freedoms contained in the international human rights treaties ratified by Australia. However, in practice, many of the international human rights standards agreed to by the Australian government cannot be enforced through the domestic legal system because they have not been adequately incorporated into Australian law. This means that, in many cases, people whose human rights have been breached are left without a legal remedy.' (Section 5.5a.  Human rights – what do I need to know? Australian Human Rights Commission.  humanrights.gov.au/letstalkaboutrights/info/index.htm)

It also means that legislators can safely ignore, wilfully, unwittingly or carelessly, the impact of their Acts on our human rights. And following their example, it also enables the regulators and law enforcement agencies and none too bright, and none too sensitive enforcers to use a ‘whatever it takes’ approach to enforcement. These can be seen as simply un-moderated and very human behaviours of which we are all capable. And for that reason we need to be protected from ourselves. 

I believe that the forgoing argument is the single most compelling reason for a judicially enforceable human rights law separate from and superior to all other legislation. That there is at least a significant minority of influential people who, despite the evidence of recent times, argue that there is already sufficient protection in law strengthens my view that eventually, our human rights must be protected within the Australian Constitution. Meanwhile a judicially enforceable Human Rights Act should be legislated effective across all Australian jurisdictions. 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?